Balarama’s Motion and orders that this action be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Based upon the analysis set forth below, the court denies Mr. 3 Having carefully considered the parties’ written memoranda and counsel’s oral arguments, the court issues the instant Memorandum Decision and Order. 2 The court heard oral argument on the motion on November 15, 2022, and, at the conclusion of the hearing, took the motion under advisement. Balarama”) Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. 1 Before the court is Plaintiff Vamshi Krishna Masineni Balarama’s (“Mr. Bennett conducting all proceedings in this case, including entry of final judgment. 73, all parties have consented to Judge Jared C. 46 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH VAMSHI KRISHNA MASINENI BALARAMA, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff, v.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |